Problems of normative and technical regulation in the project stage of dredging works in the water area of seaports

This article examines the regulatory challenges at the project stage of dredging works in the water areas of seaports in the Russian Federation. The authors highlight the absence of a unified regulatory framework due to the high fragmentation of legislation and the predominance of bylaws. This fragmentation complicates project implementation, slows the modernization of port infrastructure, and increases the risk of administrative barriers. Special attention is given to environmental aspects, including environmental impact assessment procedures, as well as the strategic role of port infrastructure in the development of the Northern Sea Route (NSR), which is recognized as a key element of national transport policy. The study analyzes the main phases of the project stage: selection of design organizations, engineering surveys, approval of documentation by Rosrybolovstvo, environmental expertise, and obtaining permits for bottom soil disposal. Systemic problems are identified, such as duplication of norms, inconsistencies in bylaws, and the emergence of informal departmental requirements, leading to monopolization of the design services market and reduced regulatory efficiency. The authors propose regulatory improvements, including the development of unified standards covering all design stages and consolidation of disparate bylaws into single regulatory documents. The need for a clear distinction between mandatory and advisory requirements for project documentation is emphasized to minimize subjectivity in regulatory decision-making. Coordination among Rosrybolovstvo, Rosprirodnadzor, and other agencies is also stressed to eliminate contradictions in regulatory practice. The analysis is based on a broad range of sources, including federal laws, executive branch acts, and technical standards. The results are of practical significance for public authorities, design organizations, and stakeholders in hydraulic engineering construction, aiming to enhance the efficiency of infrastructure project implementation amid increasing environmental safety demands and strategic state interests.

1. Kalashnikov, A. A. “Design solution for the dredging slots production.” Russian Journal Of Water Transport 72 (2022): 208–215. DOI: 10.37890/jwt.vi72.306.

2. Malygin, D. S. “Logistic features of the development strategy for the arctic zone of the russian federation (eastern part of the northern sea route).” Logistika — evraziyskiy most: Materialy XVII Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Krasnoyarsk, 27–30 aprelya 2022 goda. Tom Chast’ 1. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet, 2022: 180–184.

3. Brazovskaya, Ya. E. Arkticheskoe sudohodstvo. M.: Morkniga, 2025: 328 p.

4. Mushket, I. I. and D. I. Isaev. “Some aspects of legal regulation during dredging and bottom cleaning works on rivers and lakes.” Sovremennye problemy gidrometeorologii i ustoychivogo razvitiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Sbornik tezisov Vserossiyskoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Sankt-Peterburg, 14–15 marta 2019 goda. Sankt-Peterburg: Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy gidrometeorologicheskiy universitet, 2019: 757–759.

5. Iglin, S. M. and V. B. Korobov. “Geoecological zoning of the seaport of arkhangelsk water area during dredging.” Ecological Safety Of Coastal And Shelf Zones Of Sea 2 (2021): 131–149. DOI: 10.22449/2413-5577-2021-2-131-149.

6. Daeva, E. D. “Operation and maintenance of hydraulic engineering installations under operational management of fsue rosmorport.” Gidrotekhnika 2(63) (2021): 12–13.

7. Kagan, R. A. The dredging dilemma: how not to balance economic development and environmental protection. UC Berkeley: Institute of Governmental Studies, 1990.

8. Melnick, R. S. “Dredging: Making Waves for Commerce or Environmental Destruction.” Vill. Envtl. LJ 19 (2008): 145.

9. Fales, Tom. “Safe Harbors: A Comparative Analysis of Dredging Regulation in New England.” Ocean & Coastal LJ 21 (2016): 245.

10. Becker, S. and S. Brauer. “Beneficial Use of Dredged Material: Role of State Permitting Programs and Regulations.” (2019).

11. Firsov, Yu. G. “K voprosu o normativnykh dokumentakh dlya vypolneniya gidrograficheskikh rabot.” Navigation And Hydrography 23 (2006): 97–107.

12. Firsov, Yu. G. “Problems and tasks for the development of the russian standards and requirements for engineering and design hydrographic surveying.” Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota im. admirala S. O. Makarova 16.5 (2024): 663–678. DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2024-16-5-663-678.