Preview

Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova

Advanced search

Universal simulation model of the flow of ships to the sea cargo front of the port

https://doi.org/10.21821/2309-5180-2024-16-5-700-708

Abstract

The article describes the results of completed research aimed at clarifying the primary base of methods for technological design of ports and terminals. Along with the main parameter expected annual cargo traffic, the key for all such calculations is the structure of the ship traffic that implements this cargo flow, or the flow of the fleet of ships that sell cargo traffic. Each type of vessel is characterized by its own parameters, which determine the duration of service in the port and, ultimately, the occupancy of berths. Traditional analytical methods, without disputing the randomness of the nature of all initial and intermediate values, prescribe the use of average values for the assessment of final technological resources, correcting the results obtained by coefficients of engineering ignorance. This assumption, which makes it possible to use simple algebraic methods for working with deterministic quantities, excludes the emergence of any means of estimating the possible dispersion of values around the obtained average values. In the practice of investmentintensive facilities, such as seaports, the degree of dispersion of parameters characterizes the probability of errors of the first and second types: the creation of insufficient capacity, leading to losses from waiting in the queue for service, and the creation of excess capacity associated with the loss of excess capitalization. There is no objective measure that determines the balance between these losses, since the decision is purely entrepreneurial, based on the risk of losses and possible gains. This study describes a tool that allows you to make appropriate entrepreneurial decisions fairly objectively.

About the Authors

A. L. Kuznetsov
Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping
Russian Federation

Kuznetsov Alexander Lvovitch — HbDr, professor

5/7 Dviskaya str, St. Petersburg, 198035



О. A. Chistotin
АО ”NPO” Akonit”
Russian Federation

Chistotin Oleg Alexandrovich — department chief

314 Udarnikov str, Vologda, 160004



М. J. Zatolokina
Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping
Russian Federation

Zatolokina Marina Yuerjevna — PhD student LLC Hub Shipping

140 Moskovskyi prospect, k.2, lit. A, Saint-Petersburg, 196006



References

1. Andreeva, L. A., Kuznecov, A. L., Sampiev, A. M. and Semenov, A. D. “Zadachi sovershenstvovaniya metodov tekhnologicheskogo proektirovaniya morskih torgovyh portov v novyh usloviyah.” Transportnoe delo Rossii 1 (2024): 164‒166.

2. Kuznecov, A.L. and Pogodin, V.A. “O nesovershenstve normativnoj bazy tekhnologicheskogo proektirovaniya morskih portov.” Morskie porty Rossii 6 (2017): 18.

3. Sampiev, A. M. “Primenenie metoda Monte-Karlo dlya ocenki effektivnosti ispol’zovaniya byudzheta rabochego vremeni morskogo terminala.” Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota im. admirala S. O. Makarova 11.1 (2019): 68‒77. DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2019-11-1-68-77.

4. Valkova, S.S. and Vasil’ev, Yu.I. “Metodika ocenki sklada morskogo porta metodami imitacionnogo modelirovaniya.” Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota im. admirala S. O. Makarova 11.3 (2019): 485‒498. DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2019-11-3-485-498.

5. Kuznecov, A. L., Kirichenko, A. V., Pogodin, V. A. and SHCHerbakova-Slyusarenko, V. N. “Rol’ imitacionnogo modelirovaniya v tekhnologicheskom proektirovanii i ocenke parametrov gruzovyh terminalov.” Vestnik Astrahanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Morskaya tekhnika i tekhnologiya 2 (2017): 93–102. DOI: 10.24143/2073-1574-2017-2-93-102.

6. Tsao, Yu-Chung, and Vo-Van Thanh. “A multi-objective mixed robust possibilistic flexible programming approach for sustainable seaport-dry port network design under an uncertain environment.” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 124 (2019): 13–39.

7. Douma, A. M., Jos van Hillegersberg, and P. C. Schuur. “Design and evaluation of a simulation game to introduce a multi-agent system for barge handling in a seaport.” Decision support systems 53.3 (2012): 465–472.

8. Kuznecov, A. L., Kirichenko, A. V., Tkachenko, A. S., Popov G. B. “Imitacionnoe modelirovanie kak instrument rascheta nazemnyh kontejnernyh terminalov.” Vestnik Astrahanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Seriya: Morskaya tekhnika i tekhnologiya 1 (2018): 100–108. DOI: 10.24143/2073-1574-2018-1-100-108.

9. Port development. A handbook for planners in developing countries. New York: UNCTAD, 1985.

10. Ricci, A., and B. Blocken. “On the reliability of the 3D steady RANS approach in predicting microscale wind conditions in seaport areas: The case of the IJmuiden sea lock.” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 207 (2020): 104437.


Review

For citations:


Kuznetsov A.L., Chistotin О.A., Zatolokina М.J. Universal simulation model of the flow of ships to the sea cargo front of the port. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova. 2024;16(5):700-708. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21821/2309-5180-2024-16-5-700-708

Views: 141


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2309-5180 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0551 (Online)