Preview

Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova

Advanced search

Reliability of river fleet vessels hull elements

https://doi.org/10.21821/2309-5180-2023-15-6-1041-1053

Abstract

Improving the process of fault detection of metal ship hull elements by using a probabilistic approach is considered in the paper. The most labor-intensive part of the defect detection report, namely, measurement and assessment of hull structures individual elements wear, accounting for more than 90 % of the total measurements, is reviewed. Defect detection of a ship hull means the examination, measurement and assessment of defects in each element of the ship hull in order to establish method and volumes of repairs that ensure its reliable operation until the next survey under specified operating conditions. The necessity of carrying out a preliminary calculation stage for defect detection is substantiated. It allows you to significantly reduce the number of measurements of hull structures elements, which will have a positive effect on reducing the cost of repair both due to a smaller number of measurements and the duration of repairs. It has been proved that using the probability approach to predict the residual thickness of individual elements also takes into account the effect on the total strength, which guarantees the reliability of the ship hull in operation. Tables to assess the technical condition of individual hull elements based on their level of wear have been developed, and a method for filling them has improved. The tables are made in two versions, namely, paper and electronic, the most convenient for a specific user — the designer of the defect detection report tables. A test example of using the electronic tables for assessing technical condition by wear level, which proves that the predicted residual thicknesses obtained by calculation will in all cases, be less, than similar ones obtained from measurements results, is carried out using a representative vessel. This proves the reliability and feasibility of using the preliminary defect detection stage, which is essentially an analogue of the concept of the zero stage in ship repair. Using the probability approach to determine the residual thicknesses will allow you not only to reduce the costs of defect detection of the hull itself, but also at early stages (before placing the ship on a slip or dock) to reduce the volume of hull structures repairs, and to choose the most appropriate and effective method of repair.

About the Authors

A. B. Krasiuk
Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping
Russian Federation

Krasiuk, Alla B. — PhD, professor 

5/7 Dvinskaya Str., St. Petersburg, 198035



V. B. Chistov
Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping
Russian Federation

Chistov, Valentin B. — Dr. of Technical Sciences, professor 

5/7 Dvinskaya Str., St. Petersburg, 198035



V. G. Nikifirov
Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping
Russian Federation

Nikiforov, Vladimir G. — Dr. of Technical Sciences, professor 

5/7 Dvinskaya Str., St. Petersburg, 198035



References

1. Baryshnikov, Sergei O., Alla B. Krasiuk, and Valentin B. Chistov. “Optimal fault detection of river ship hulls.” Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova 14.6 (2022): 915–930. DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2022-14-6-915-930.

2. Krasyuk, Alla Borisovna, and Valentin Borisovitch Tchistov. “Defect detection and repair of ice belt sheets for inland water icebreakers.” Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova 5(33) (2015): 86–92. DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2015-7-5-86-92/

3. Krasyuk, A. B., and V. B. Chistov. “Methodological outlines of the defect detection of the vessels steel hulls.” Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova 3 (2013): 87–93.

4. Baryshnikov, S. O., T. O. Karklina, and V. B. Chistov. “Repair and reliability of river service ships.” Sudostroenie 1(854) (2021): 10–13. DOI: 10.54068/00394580_2021_1_10/

5. Bimberekov, Pavel Alexandrovich. “Adjustment of the methods of determination of the residual thickness of the plating in accordance with the project of Russian river registry.” Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Marine engineering and technologies 1 (2015): 7–13.

6. Bimberekov, P. A. “Determination of needed number of measurements of residual thicknesses on part of ship hull connection element on base of relationships for reserve of thicknesses and recommended rates of wear.” Nauchnye problemy transporta Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka 1 (2015): 76–80.

7. Zyablov, O. K., and E. V. Funtikova. “Graphics modeling of repair items included in hull and propulsion and steering assembly fault finding sheets presented in electronic form.” Bulletin of VSAWT 31 (2012): 57–59.

8. Zyablov, O. K., and A. N. Naumenko. “Comparative analysis of the rules of RMRS and RRR in the field of survey and inspection of ships.” Trudy 19‑go mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-promyshlennogo foruma “Velikie reki‑2018”. Nizhnii Novgorod: Volzhskii gosudarstvennyi universitet vodnogo transporta, 2018.

9. Ogneva, V. V., and E. G. Burmistrov. “Features of forecasting regarding ship hill wear when estimating shiprepair scope.” Sudostroenie 5(816) (2014): 46–49.

10. Zinov’ev, P. V., V. A. Kompanets, and O. E. Surov. “Metodika otsenki dostovernosti rezul’tatov zamerov ostatochnykh tolshchin pri defektatsii sudovykh konstruktsii.” Nauchno-tekhnicheskii sbornik Rossiiskogo morskogo registra sudokhodstva 40–41 (2015): 41–48.

11. Girin, S. N., I. A. Gulyaev, and Yu. I. Efimenkov. “General principles of accounting operational limitations for justification of a navigation characteristics of coastal ships.” Bulletin of VSAWT 57 (2018): 18–26.

12. Burakovskii, E. P., Yu. I. Nechaev, P. E. Burakovskii, and V. P. Prokhnich. Ekspluatatsionnaya prochnost’ sudov. Izd-vo «Lan’», 2021.

13. Burakovskiy, E. P., and P. E. Burakovskiy. “Rationing of parameters of progressing defects of the ships hulls.” Innovatsii v nauke i obrazovanii — 2011. Trudy IX Mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii. Vol. 1. Kaliningrad: Kaliningradskii gosudarstvennyi tekhnicheskii universitet, 2011. 345–347.

14. Zyablov, Oleg K., Yury A. Kochnev, and Irina B. Kochneva. “Automated generation of the ship fault detection report by using the graphical-mathematical model of the hull.” Bulletin of VSAWT 59 (2019): 62–69.

15. Bimberekov, P. A. “Same aspects of monitoring of ship hull strength during its exploitation.” Nauchnye problemy transporta Sibiri i Dal’nego Vostoka 2 (2009): 155–160.

16. Burmistrov, E. G., and D. A. Kromov. “Analysis of the causes and the localization areas of the hull outer plating wear of inland and mixed (river-sea) navigation ships.” Russian Journal of Water Transport 70 (2022): 15–29. DOI: 10.37890/jwt.vi70.244.


Review

For citations:


Krasiuk A.B., Chistov V.B., Nikifirov V.G. Reliability of river fleet vessels hull elements. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova. 2023;15(6):1041-1053. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21821/2309-5180-2023-15-6-1041-1053

Views: 209


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2309-5180 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0551 (Online)