Preview

Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova

Advanced search

Adaptive dynamic safety domain for different sailing conditions

https://doi.org/10.21821/2309-5180-2023-15-6-932-940

Abstract

The problem of navigation safety is considered, in particular, the problem of developing an algorithm for an adaptive dynamic safety domain for various navigation conditions is investigated. The risk assessment of a ship approach situation is based on the safety domain as the minimum area around the ship into which an oncoming ship should not enter. Navigation conditions are considered in accordance with the rules of COLREG‑72 for navigation of vessels with limited visibility and being in sight of each other. To solve this problem, the navigation areas are classified. For further analysis, a table for the conditions and areas of navigation to identify the shape of the domains is created. The hydro meteorological situation, which takes into account the navigation conditions, and as a consequence, the need to increase the size of the safety domain, is considered. Changes in the parameters and shape of ship safety domains for different navigation conditions have been identified. For each district and navigation conditions, an original configuration of the security domain is proposed. The dynamic changes of the domain during movement in traffic separation systems and channels are separately considered. Using an example, a situation when the bow of the domain crosses the dividing line, which can lead to the appearance of false dangerous targets, is simulated. To avoid such situations, a dynamic domain with a changing shape in the form of an ellipse for swimming in a traffic separation system and channels, taking into account sailing conditions with limited visibility and in sight of each other is proposed. For the calculation, an algorithm to determine the shape of the domain under different visibility conditions and navigation areas has been compiled. Calculations for the case when the vessel enters a turn in traffic separation systems and narrow spaces have been performed. The deformation of the domain during rotation is shown.

About the Authors

S. V. Smolentsev
Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping
Russian Federation

Smolentsev, Sergey V. — Dr. of Technical Sciences, professor 

5/7 Dvinskaya Str., St. Petersburg 198035



A. E. Filyakov
Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping
Russian Federation

Filyakov, Alexey E. — Senior Lecturer 

5/7 Dvinskaya Str., St. Petersburg 198035



D. V. Isakov
Admiral Makarov State University of Maritime and Inland Shipping
Russian Federation

Isakov, Dmitry V. — Associate professor

5/7 Dvinskaya Str., St. Petersburg 198035



References

1. Smolentsev, Sergey V., and Alexey E. Filyakov. “Convergence danger degree assessment based on the dynamic ship’s safety domain.” Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova 12.5 (2020): 831–839. DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2020-12-5-831-839.

2. Egorov, I. B., and V. A. Loginovsky. “Review of ship domain concept and it’s application in navigation.” Ekspluatatsiya morskogo transporta 3(69) (2012): 13–17.

3. Cockcroft, A. N., and J. N. F. Lameijer. A guide to the collision avoidance rules. 7th edition. ButterworthHeinemann, 2012.

4. Fujii, Yahei, and Kenichi Tanaka. “Traffic capacity.” The Journal of navigation 24.4 (1971): 543–552. DOI: 10.1017/S0373463300022384.

5. Goodwin, Elisabeth M. “A statistical study of ship domains.” The Journal of navigation 28.3 (1975): 328–344. DOI: 10.1017/S0373463300041230.

6. Davis, P. V., M. J. Dove, and C. T. Stockel. “A computer simulation of marine traffic using domains and arenas.” The journal of Navigation 33.2 (1980): 215–222. DOI: 10.1017/S0373463300035220.

7. Grinyak, V. M., A. S. Devyatisil’nyi, and M. V. Trofimov. “Vizual’noe predstavlenie parametrov traektorii bezopasnogo dvizheniya sudna.” Marine Intelligent Technologies 3–1(33) (2016): 269–273.

8. Tam, CheeKuang, Richard Bucknall, and Alistair Greig. “Review of collision avoidance and path planning methods for ships in close range encounters.” The Journal of Navigation 62.3 (2009): 455–476. DOI: 10.1017/S0373463308005134.

9. Zhao, Jing-Sung, Zhao-Lin Wu, Feng-Chen Wang, and E. M. Goodwin. “Comments of ship domains.” The Journal of Navigation 46.3 (1993): 422–436.

10. Burmaka, A. I. “The strategy of maneuvering of ships in a situation of excessive proximity.” Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova 1(23) (2014): 20–22.

11. Vaskov, A. S., and M. A. Garashchenko. “The methods for conception of ship’’s domain.” Ekspluatatsiya morskogo transporta 3(84) (2017): 38–44.

12. Grinyak, V. M., and A. S. Devyatisilny. “Fuzzy logic decision-making system for ships collision avoidance.” Herald of computer and information technologies 11(125) (2014): 36–42. DOI: 10.14489/vkit.2014.011.pp.036–042.


Review

For citations:


Smolentsev S.V., Filyakov A.E., Isakov D.V. Adaptive dynamic safety domain for different sailing conditions. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova. 2023;15(6):932-940. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21821/2309-5180-2023-15-6-932-940

Views: 218


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2309-5180 (Print)
ISSN 2500-0551 (Online)