Study of the influence of directed gas-dynamic oscillations on the operation of a fuel cell in a shipboard power plant

The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of existing active and passive methods for water management in fuel cells. The study aims to experimentally evaluate the effect of directed gas-dynamic oscillations in the audible frequency range on the performance of a single fuel cell, as well as to develop recommendations for improving such systems for shipboard power plants. The configuration of the developed laboratory test bench for in situ testing under electrochemical reaction conditions is described using a prototype cell with an active area of 25 cm² and an external gas-dynamic generator. It was found that gas-dynamic excitation at the fundamental frequency of 1.68 kHz increases the power density of the studied cell by more than 25% due to the intensification of mass transfer processes and the efficient removal of excess moisture. The obtained results experimentally confirm the prospects for integrating gas-dynamic control systems into shipboard fuel cell power plants. A distinctive feature of this study compared with similar studies is the implementation of in situ tests using an external gas-dynamic generator operating in the audible frequency range. For the first time in the Russian scientific literature, the resonant mechanism of gas-dynamic action on gaseous reactants and the membrane electrode assembly is experimentally substantiated, and the possibility of a significant increase in fuel cell output power using the proposed method is demonstrated. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to decarbonize waterborne transport in accordance with the requirements of the International Maritime Organization, as well as by the absence of active gas-dynamic water management systems for shipboard fuel cell power plants in Russia. The results obtained can be used as a basis for developing adaptive moisture removal systems operating under actual operating conditions.

1. Zhaka, V. and B. Samuelsson. “Hydrogen as fuel in the maritime sector: From production to propulsion.” Energy Reports 12 (2024): 5249–5267. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2024.11.005.

2. Jayabal, R. “Hydrogen energy storage in maritime operations: A pathway to decarbonization and sustainability.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 109 (2025): 1133–1144. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.207.

3. Konyaev, D. V. “Ship power plant with re-liquefaction installation for tankers transporting hydrogen.” Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova 15.1 (2023): 93–108. DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2023-15-1-93-108.

4. Rozov, I. V., O. V. Spirenkova, S. V. Titov et al. “Review of foreign hydrogen strategies and the possibilities of their adaptation in water transport in the russian federation .” Transport Business in Russia 1 (2026): 155–162.

5. Jin, C., JH. Choi, C. Lee and MH. Kim. “Sustainable Maritime Decarbonization: A Review of Hydrogen and Ammonia as Future Clean Marine Energies.” Sustainability 17.24 (2025). DOI: 10.3390/su172411364.

6. Ijaodola, O. S., A. G. Olabi et al. “Energy efficiency improvements by investigating the water flooding management on proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC).” Energy 179 ( 2019): 2 46–267. D OI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.074.

7. Kim, J. Y., M. Mortazavi and S. Y. Jung. “Improving polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell performance and preventing flooding by exciting gas flow.” Journal of Power Sources 617 (2024): 235181. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235181.

8. Shen, J., S. H. Chan et al. “Partial flooding and its effect on the performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell.” Energy Conversion and Management 207 (2020): 112537. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112537.

9. Park, M. J. and S. Y. Kim. “Ion transport in sulfonated polymers.” Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics 51.7 (2013): 481–493. DOI: 10.1002/polb.23257.

10. Choi, H., T. Park et al. “Observation of flooding-induced performance enhancement in PEMFCs.” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 47.9 (2022): 6259–6268. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.234.

11. Bazylak, A., D. Sinton and N. Djilali. “Dynamic water transport and droplet emergence in PEMFC gas diffusion layers.” Journal of Power Sources 176.1 (2008): 240–246. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.10.066.

12. Mortazavi, M. and S. Y. Jung. “Role of Droplet Dynamics on Contact Line Depinning in Shearing Gas Flow.” Langmuir 39.30 (2023): 10301–10311. DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00065.

13. Ous, T. and C. Arcoumanis. “Visualisation of water accumulation in the flow channels of PEMFC under various operating conditions.” Journal of Power Sources 187.1 (2009): 182–189. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.072.

14. Kim, J. Y. and S. Y. Jung. “Performance recovery of irreversibly degraded gas diffusion layers in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell.” Energy Conversion and Management 342 (2025): 120175. DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2025.120175.

15. Kim, Y. H., H. S. Han, S. Y. Kim and G. H. Rhee. “Influence of cathode flow pulsation on performance of proton-exchange membrane fuel cell.” Journal of Power Sources 185.1 ( 2008): 1 12–117. D OI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.069.

16. Majasan, J. O., D. J. L. Brett et al. “Recent advances in acoustic diagnostics for electrochemical power systems.” Journal of Physics: Energy 3.3 (2021): 032011. DOI: 10.1088/2515-7655/abfb4a.

17. Palan, V., W. S. Shepard and K. A. Williams. “Removal of excess product water in a PEM fuel cell stack by vibrational and acoustical methods.” Journal of Power Sources 161.2 (2006): 1116–1125. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.06.021.

18. Mortazavi, M., A. D. Santamaria, J. Z. Benner and V. Chauhan. “Enhanced Water Removal from PEM Fuel Cells Using Acoustic Pressure Waves.” Journal of The Electrochemical Society 166.7 (2019): F3143. DOI: 10.1149/2.0211907jes.

19. Rozov, I. V., S. A. Lopatin, D. V. Baranov et al. “Microfibre gas diffusion layers for fuel cells of ship’s power plants.” Rechnoy transport (XXI vek) 1(113) (2025): 34–37.