Research approaches to improving the technological efficiency of construction of vessels of the floating power unit type
https://doi.org/10.21821/2309-5180-2026-18-1-98-111
EDN: WEBLFH
Abstract
The This study analyzes organizational and technological approaches to improving the manufacturability, or technological efficiency, of constructing floating power units (FPUs), which represent a promising solution for energy supply to Arctic territories and the infrastructure of the Northern Sea Route. The relevance of the work is determined by state plans for Arctic development and the necessity of mastering serial production of FPUs, which requires reducing labor intensity, construction time, and costs while ensuring high quality of hull structures and the safety of nuclear power installations. The purpose of the research is to systematize organizational and technical measures aimed at improving efficiency at all stages of the FPU life cycle. The study examines the experience of constructing the “Akademik Lomonosov” and distributed shipyard projects, identifying ten key technological positions in production, including lofting, hull processing, outfitting, and testing. The authors propose developing general technical requirements (GTR) for the fabrication of hull structures, protective shells, and pipelines, as well as introducing albums of standard hull structures and welded joints to standardize production. Particular attention is given to design and technological solutions, such as optimizing the placement of cutouts in sections, minimizing assembly welded joints, and applying probabilistic methods, including PERT/COST, for estimating durations. The study further considers improvements in non-destructive testing of welded joints, the transition to national standards, the potential use of polymer pipelines for auxiliary systems, and optimization of the testing program for protective shells and reactor compartment barriers. A comprehensive system of organizational and technical measures has been developed, covering technological support for construction, quality management, and documentation unification. The obtained results can serve as a methodological basis for the development of manufacturability management programs in serial production of FPUs and may be adapted for other Arctic vessel projects, providing both practical guidance and a framework for improving construction efficiency while maintaining safety and reliability.
About the Authors
E. S. MoseykoRussian Federation
Moseyko, Evgeniy S. — Process Engineer of the Department of Technology Industrial Economy and Materials Rationing
36 Bol’shoi Ave., St. Petersburg, 199034
E. O. Olhovik
Russian Federation
Olhovik, Evgeniy O. — Grand PhD in Technical Sciences, associate professor
5/7 Dvinskaya Str., St. Petersburg, 198035
References
1. Zverev, D. L., V. V. Petrunin, S. V. Babushkin et al. “JSC “Afrikantov Okbm” — scientific and manufacturing center of nuclear engineering. 75 years of working in nuclear industry.” Atomic Energy 129.1 (2020): 3–13.
2. Sarkisov, A. A., D. O. Smolentsev, S. V. Antipov et al. “Prospects of using nuclear power technologies in the arctic.” Arctic: Ecology and Economy 12.3 (2022): 349–358. DOI: 10.25283/2223-4594-2022-3-349-358.
3. Aleksandrov, M. V., Yu. M. Gabdrafikov, V. N. Polovinkin et al. “Regarding innovative development of shipbuilding in the Russian Federation.” Shipbuilding 3(868) (2023): 3–11.
4. Savchenko, O. V. and V. N. Polovinkin. “Current state, problems and prospects for development of domestic ship building industry.” Shipbuilding 3(862) (2022): 3–10.
5. Lisitskiy, V. V., A. A. Vasil’ev, K. D. Mogilko et al. “Prospects for introducing advanced technologies at enterprises of southern center of shipbuilding and ship repair, JSC.” Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Marine Engineering and Technologies 2 (2023): 41–46. DOI: 10.24143/2073-1574-2023-2-41-46.
6. Moseyko, E. S., E. O. Ol’khovik and V. Yu. Rud’. “A multi-level system for ensuring the reliability of marine mechanical systems at the stages of the life cycle.” Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova 16.5 (2024): 775–783. DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2024-16-5-775-783.
7. Jurewicz J. M. Design and construction of an offshore floating nuclear power plant. — Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2015. Web. December 12, 2025 < https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/103707 >.
8. Buongiorno, J., J. Jurewicz, M. Golay and N. Todreas. “The Offshore Floating Nuclear Plant Concept.” Nuclear Technology 194.1 (2016): 1–14. DOI: 10.13182/NT15-49.
9. Lebedeva, E. G. and A. A. Sompol’tseva. “Ensuring the technological capability of ship hull structures when creating an electronic model.” Marine Intelligent Technologies 3–1(49) (2020): 102–109. DOI: 10.37220/MIT.2020.49.3.013.
10. Wei, N.-C., C.-P. Bao, S.-Y. Yao and P.-S. Wang. “Earned value management views on improving performance of engineering project management.” International Journal of Organizational Innovation 8.4 (2016).
11. Veselkov, V. V. and M. A. Kobets. “Printsipy realizatsii i razvitiya tekhnologii avtomatizirovannogo izgotovleniya korpusnykh konstruktsiy.” Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova 1(29) (2015): 82–89. DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2015-7-1-82-89.
12. Gulyy, V. A. and V. V. Kondrat’ev. “Some suggestions for improving the steam distribution system of the main turbine unit of the nuclear icebreaker project 22220.” Research Bulletin by Russian Maritime Register of Shipping 79 (2025): 137–147.
13. Reutskiy, A. S., V. V. Yakimov and A. A. Butsanets. “Assessment of the impact of the type of marine fuel used on the carbon footprint of the transport service.” Research Bulletin by Russian Maritime Register of Shipping 76 (2024): 87–95.
14. Moseyko, E. S., E. O. Ol’khovik and V. G. Nikiforov. “Application of structural methods to assess the reliability of ship’s mechanical systems.” Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova 15.5 (2023): 834–844. DOI: 10.21821/2309-5180-2023-15-5-834-844.
15. Dobrodeev, A. A. and K. E. Sazonov. “What should be the power capacity of a supership to operate in the eastern part of the arctic?” Arctic: Ecology and Economy 14.3(55) (2024): 427–436. DOI: 10.25283/2223-45942024-3-427-436.
16. Rogov, A. Z., S. A. Ogay and A. S. Ogay. “Prospects for the development of ship repair in the far east.” Fefu: School of Engineering Bulletin 1(62) (2025): 89–104. DOI: 10.24866/2227-6858/2025-1/89-104.
Review
For citations:
Moseyko E.S., Olhovik E.O. Research approaches to improving the technological efficiency of construction of vessels of the floating power unit type. Vestnik Gosudarstvennogo universiteta morskogo i rechnogo flota imeni admirala S. O. Makarova. 2026;18(1):98-111. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21821/2309-5180-2026-18-1-98-111. EDN: WEBLFH
JATS XML




















