Experimental study of a new type of hydrodynamic log

This paper presents research on the development of a new type of ship speed measuring device based on microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). A design deficiency in the configuration proposed in the authors’ earlier publications has been identified. Computer-based calculations demonstrated a significant error in determining vessel speed, caused by inaccurate measurement of static water pressure resulting from fluid flow around a cylindrical body. Further studies were carried out using modern software packages to evaluate errors in vessel speed measurement and to determine the optimal geometry of the log tube and the best locations for installing pressure sensors. Based on the results of numerical simulations, an improved design is proposed that reduces measurement error. Experimental testing of a prototype under real marine conditions confirmed the feasibility of measuring a vessel’s relative speed using MEMS components. The model presented in this study eliminates many of the drawbacks characteristic of previous generations of hydrodynamic logs. The device has been significantly miniaturized, creating prospects for installation on both conventional vessels and small autonomous maritime craft. Key directions for further research are highlighted.

1. Han, X., Huang, M., Wu, Z., Gao, Y., Xia, Y., Yang, P., Fan, S., Lu, X., Yang, X., Liang, L., Su, W., Wang, L., Cui, Z., Zhao, Y., Li, Z., Zhao, L., & Jiang, Z. (2023). Advances in high-performance MEMS pressure sensors: design, fabrication, and packaging. Microsystems & Nanoengineering, 9. DOI: 10.1038/s41378-023-00620-1.

2. Geng, S.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, J. A Vision- Based Ship Speed Measurement Method Using Deep Learning // Proceedings of the 2023 7th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS). — 2023. — Pp. 1753–1759.

3. Alkhimenko, S. I., A. A. Arakelyan, T. E. Zhigalov and A. V. Artem’ev. “Scheme of construction of modern hydrodynamic log.” Youth. Science. innovations 1 (2021): 41–45.

4. Antonov, A. A., A. V. Artem’ev and O. O. Drobysheva. “Prospects for the development of ship relative speed measurement instruments.” Morskie issledovaniya na Dal’nem Vostoke: sbornik dokladov VII nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, Vladivostok, 19 noyabrya 2024 goda. Vladivostok: Morskoy gosudarstvennyy universitet imeni admirala G. I. Nevel’skogo, 2024: 122–126.

5. Ferrera, M., V. Creuze, J. Moras and P. Trouvé- Peloux. “AQUALOC: An underwater dataset for visual–inertial–pressure localization.” The International Journal of Robotics Research 38.14 (2019): 1549–1559. DOI: 10.1177/0278364919883346.

6. Yuce, M. I. and D. A. Kareem. “A Numerical Analysis of Fluid Flow Around Circular and Square Cylinders.” Journal AWWA 108.10 (2016): E546–E554. DOI: 10.5942/jawwa.2016.108.0141.

7. Jiang, H. and L. Cheng. “Large-eddy simulation of flow past a circular cylinder for Reynolds numbers 400 to 3900.” Physics of Fluids 33.3 (2021): 034119. DOI: 10.1063/5.0041168.

8. COMSOL Multiphysics vs SolidWorks. Web. 20 March 2025 <https://www.softwaresuggest.com/compare/comsol-multiphysics-vs-solidworks>.

9. Fialkova, E., V. Baronov, A. Slobodin and K. Nechaev. “SolidWorks flow simulation software potential in hydrodynamic processes analysis for cone vortex emulsion.” E3S Web of Conf. 402 (2023): 03007. DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202340203007.

10. Masna, Tulus and Sawal. “Computational analysis dynamics fluid of flow in dam using COMSOL Multiphysics.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2421.1 (2023): 012047. DOI: 10.1088/1742–6596/2421/1/012047.